About the Author: Michael J. Murphy is an attorney with the law firm of Botto Gilbert Lancaster, PC, ("BGL") in Crystal Lake, IL. Since being admitted to the bar in 2000, Mr. Murphy has focused his practice on residential and commercial real estate, during which time he has represented clients in thousands of such matters. Additional information about Mr. Murphy and BGL may be viewed at www.bgllaw.net.
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Can an attorney represent both the Buyer and Seller on the same real estate matter?
This
question often comes up when the transaction is between related parties or when
one party is simply determined to forego legal representation. In short, it is a serious conflict of interest for any
attorney to attempt to represent both parties in a real estate matter. In most
cases, inevitably something arises to cause the parties’ respective interests
not to completely align. For example, the lender’s appraisal may determine that
the fair market value of the property is lower than the purchase price; or,
perhaps the home inspection reveals major issues for which the buyer was
unaware. In either case, it would not be possible to properly represent the
interests of either party vis-à-vis the other. Similarly, the same inherent
conflict exists with respect to a real estate broker acting as a dual agent in
one transaction.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment